Domination Chronicles 009: McGirt v. Oklahoma: Revealing and Concealing Domination
Episode 9 examines McGirt v. Oklahoma, jurisdiction, federal power, and the revealing and concealing of domination.
Published on: | Published by: Steven T. Newcomb | Tags: mcgirt jurisdiction federal-indian-law podcast
An analysis of McGirt v. Oklahoma and the way the decision reveals and conceals domination in U.S. law and jurisdiction.
For ILI readers, McGirt is a useful example of how a decision can be celebrated while still operating inside a federal framework of domination. Episode 9 tracks both sides: what the case reveals and what it leaves concealed.
This short resource post is part of an Indigenous Law Institute guide to the Domination Chronicles archive. The goal is to help readers move from ILI’s work on empire, Christian discovery, federal Indian law, and the right of domination into the podcast conversations where those themes are examined episode by episode.